When Did Helping Someone Become A Crime?

A man helped a young abuse victim at ~4:30 AM. He took every precaution. She told police she felt safe. Now he faces false accusations of kidnapping and rape — and $10,000 in legal bills he cannot afford.

Support His Legal Defense

100% of donations go directly to legal costs defending against false accusations

The Chilling Effect

When good people face criminal accusations for helping others, fewer people help. This case shows what happens when doing the right thing leads to devastating consequences—false allegations of rape and kidnapping despite overwhelming evidence of innocence.

Why This Matters →

What Really Happened

A man helped a young woman who'd been abused and thrown out at 4 AM. He left the door open, kept his distance, contacted authorities. She told police she felt safe with him. Her mother filed a restraining order claiming rape and kidnapping. The accusations are categorically false.

See The Evidence →

Justice Requires Resources

He is not currently employed and working on several writing projects. He faces $10,000 in legal bills to defend against accusations that contradict the victim's own statement to police. Without help, false accusations win by default.

Support His Defense →
$10,000
Legal Bills for False Accusations
$____
Raised So Far
___
Supporters
0
Evidence of Criminal Wrongdoing
The Case
The Case

A Good Samaritan's Nightmare: When Helping Leads to False Accusations

Around 4:30 AM or so, a middle-aged man was walking for health and exercise when a young woman in visible distress approached him. She'd been walking the streets for four hours after being thrown out of her home. She needed help contacting someone. He faced a choice every decent person should feel safe making: help her, or walk away.

He chose to help. He gave her his name and address upfront. He let her use his computer to contact family. When they reached the house where he was staying, he left the front door wide open the entire time. He maintained at least three feet of distance. He never positioned himself between her and the door. He never made physical contact. He recorded part of the conversation to document the interaction. He took her to a restaurant to wait for her sister.

During breakfast, she revealed the full extent of what had happened: Her mother had hit her. Her mother had violently ripped a locket from her neck. Her mother had screamed at her to leave. She was terrified to go home. She'd been walking the streets since midnight. When her sister never arrived, he knew this situation required professional intervention. Despite her pleas not to call police, he contacted authorities because she needed protection, medical evaluation, and professional help.

When police interviewed her, the young woman told them she had felt safe with him. That statement—her own words to law enforcement—should have been the end of the story.

Instead, her mother filed a restraining order accusing him of rape and kidnapping. These accusations are categorically false. He has audio recordings of their conversation proving transparency. He has the young woman's own statement to police. He has the testimony of the elderly woman who was present when authorities arrived. He has a detailed timeline showing every safety measure he took. He has zero physical evidence against him because nothing happened. What he doesn't have is $10,000 for legal defense.

Support His Legal Defense

What Actually Happened: A Timeline of Transparency

Every action taken demonstrates the opposite of criminal intent

Approximately 4:30 AM

Initial Encounter

Young woman approached while he was walking. She was in visible distress, wearing hoodie and stocking cap in darkness. She stated she'd been kicked out and walking since midnight. She asked for help contacting someone.

4:30-4:45 AM

Conversation Outside

Spoke with her outside for 10-15 minutes. Before proceeding further, he provided his full name and street address. He explained exactly what assistance he could provide. He established transparency from the first moment of contact.

Approximately 4:45-5:05 AM

Computer Access with Maximum Precautions

She used his computer to contact family for approximately 20 minutes. Left outside door wide open entire time. Maintained minimum 3-foot distance at all times. Never positioned himself between her and exit. Never made physical contact. Attempted to photograph her to send to police friend—she declined, he respected her wishes. Recorded approximately half their conversation with her knowledge.

5:05-6:00 AM

Additional Conversation

Continued talking before heading to restaurant. During this time, details of the situation became clearer. She spoke very softly, making parts difficult to understand. She displayed visible signs of trauma and fear.

6:15-7:15 AM

Restaurant Safety and Abuse Disclosure

Restaurant opened at 6 AM. Ate breakfast for approximately one hour. During this time, she disclosed abuse details: mother hit her, ripped locket from neck, yelled at her to leave. She displayed clear signs of PTSD—constantly watching windows, startled by cars, hid under table when vehicle appeared. She had not eaten one bite of food due to fear and anxiety.

During Breakfast

Professional Guidance Sought

After learning extent of abuse, he texted friend who works as therapist at community mental health organization. Friend advised calling 988 hotline or police. She adamantly refused police contact, fearing she'd be returned home. He determined professional intervention necessary despite her objections.

7:15-7:45 AM

Additional Adult Witness Secured

Took her to home of elderly woman (Abigail) he regularly helps, ensuring another adult witness present. She spoke with Abigail for approximately 15 minutes. This provided additional time for her to feel safe and be in presence of another caring adult.

Just Before 8:00 AM

Authorities Contacted and Arrived

Contacted law enforcement. Officers arrived and immediately acted aggressively toward the young woman, accusing her of fabrication before asking a single question. She was terrified by the police interaction. Despite this, she told police she felt safe with him. Her fears were realized when officers released her to her mother—the very person she'd accused of abuse—despite the allegations and visible trauma.

The Very Next Day

False Accusations Filed

Mother filed restraining order claiming rape and kidnapping occurred. These accusations contradict the young woman's own statement to police, contradict all physical evidence, and contradict every documented action taken across nearly four hours of documented interaction.

The Proof of Innocence

Her Own Words Prove His Innocence

"She told police she felt safe with him."
— Young woman's statement to law enforcement, documented in official report

This single statement—given to police officers, not to him, during official questioning—contradicts every accusation her mother has made. The victim herself confirmed his conduct was appropriate. Combined with audio recordings, witness testimony, documented timeline, and zero physical evidence of wrongdoing, the truth is incontrovertible: he helped someone in crisis and took extraordinary precautions to do it properly.

Supporting Evidence:

  • Audio recording of approximately half their conversation
  • Young woman's statement to police confirming she felt safe
  • Testimony of elderly woman present when authorities arrived
  • Complete timeline documenting every safety measure
  • Text messages with mental health professional seeking guidance
  • Zero physical evidence contradicting his account
  • Observable PTSD behaviors consistent with her abuse allegations
  • His transparency from first moment of contact

Frequently Asked Questions

Find answers to common questions about the case and how you can help

Get Updates on This Case

Receive updates on the legal proceedings and how your support is making a difference.